Skip to main content

You are more right than wrong.

 We all overall, and underneath it all within it all, and behind it all, know what is going on overall and underneath it all within it all, and behind it all. 

That means that we know how everything works in general which we apply at least subconsciously to each and every situation. If we were not that fundamental knowledge ourselves then we wouldn't be able to learn anything further... and so we each and all are that fundamental knowledge.

Even specifics of each and any and every situation we know way way way way more than we give or allow ourselves and each other credit for. 

It's impossible for any of us other than the Lunatara (who are not us) to know every little thing that goes on in every corner of the universe. Each of the Lunatara is the soulmate of every n each other soul ever. But us? We need each other's help. We are each and all more connected to each and every other than not. But we need each other to complete the outer picture... The further realization of both each other's specific stories and situations and of the general situation for each and every one. For the entirety of all that is.

But we still all know way more about each situation than we realize we know. Each person, though, still knows best about their own inner situation (infinitely more than anyone else does other than their own true soulmates who know just as much though never more about it than they do) about their own general inner situation and past experiences... that trumps any outer situation they are in... so no one has any right to control anyone else's mind or life... but in all other immediate instances within a room or whatever, we all have the right to behave as though we know more rather than less... to find that more that we know, to recognize it, and to use it. That is our freedom to run our own lives right there.

We have been taught and told that the only things we understand are the things we are outwardly able to express, and the things that others find important about or acknowledge about what we understand. And the things that they have told us we understand... or that we are supposed to or allowed to understand according to them. The things they want us to understand. The things it serves them for us to understand. Or the things we think we will outwardly use... as opposed to everything being what we will need and want and use at some point.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Roses Are Red, revised (had a lot of mistakes before)

Roberta's voicemail to Elton: Today's protest rally Roses are red, bear spray is for bears, the human you sprayed suffered retinal tears. If you need to defend yourself order some mace. If I see more bear spray I will cut up your face. Elton to Roberta: Moron. Roses are red, You're not as smart as you think. If you don't watch your mouth, you'll end up in the clink. I happen to know several cops and a judge. If you don't show respect I will beat you to sludge. Roberta to Elton: Hypocrite. Roses are red, You threatened me too. If today I'm arrested, tomorrow it's you. I have talked to your friends and I know you are bluffing. Leave me alone or I'll rip out your stuffing. Elton to Roberta: Cease and desist. Roses are red, Jail is boring. There isn't good food or even adequate flooring. If you don't stop now I will call the police. I will get your ass charged with disturbing my peace. Roberta to Elton: Protect yourself. Roses are red and I happe...

I'm back with a brand new rant about an old AND new issue.

The issue is this:  Don't ever call me passive and then expect to remain on good terms with me. "Passive" is not a neutral statement. "Passive" means stupid. "Passive" means incapable. "Passive" means lazy. "Passive" means confused, which basically in this case also means stupid. "Passive" means cowardly. "Passive" means not all there or vegetative. "Passive" can also mean boring, but that's the least of our worries given the other things it means. It is not a neutral term. Use it if you want; I'm not the speech or thought police. But using it on me will cost our friendship. Because just like I can't and would never force you to speak a certain way, you can't ad shouldn't want to force me to take demeaning, degrading treatment. "Passive" is the assumption that I don't have good reasons for being quiet or civil, or that I shouldn't be allowed to choose for myself whe...

You might need a new one. We all do sometimes.

To everyone in the world, myself included sometimes: If dehumanizing anyone is part of your religion, you need a new religion. If dehumanizing others is part of your job, then you need a new job. If dehumanizing people was part of your education, then you need a new education. If dehumanizing you is how your family bonds, then you need a new family. If dehumanizing you brings your friends closer together, then you need new friends. If dehumanizing someone is a release for you, then you need a new release. If dehumanizing anyone is a pastime for you, then you need a new pastime. If dehumanizing anyone at all, any sentient being, or everyone, or a few, or certain types, even sometimes, is your lifestyle, then you need a new lifestyle. I would never tell you WHAT lifestyle to have, just pick any one that doesn't involve or include or encourage dehumanization of anyone!