No actual way of being is soulless. And no way of doing is soulless unless it involves the idea that any being or way of being is or ever could be soulless.
So my style is no more or less soulless than yours.
What I want to tell a lot of western society is that a so-called borderline personality or so-called co-dependence is no less or more soulless or selfish or evil than PTSD or CPTSD or supposed individualism. And I want to tell a lot of eastern society the flipside of that.
Being nuts AKA so-called nuts at all is no less or more human than being normal or so-called "not nuts" or so called not traumatized.
The only opposite styles that are superior or inferior to each other are where acknowkedgement or denial of one's or others' sentience enters the picture.
Validation and upholding and affirming and defending and loving and acknowledging of one's own and others' and everyone's sentience versus anything lacking in that validation, without overwhelming validation of the sentience being there telling everyone that any insulting outburst there was never truly meant .
Comments
Post a Comment