Skip to main content

On "designated favorite people" and scapegoats

I sometimes have a love-hate relationship with the idea of borderline personality disorder. It is a toxic attitude about it that I sometimes end up with, but I'm trying to work on it. I refuse to put my whole life into that though because I have bigger better fish to fry that ultimately includes all that but also includes ad focuses more on more pressing and important issues more personal to me and mine. I won't break myself because anyone orders me to.


But the all or nothing borderline crap irks me. I know it's a disgusting stereotype ad I don't actually mean it's a borderline thing at all... just a human trait from trauma, but that takes too long to say, but I still need to make you aware that it's just the way I'm saying it, not what I'm thinking or feeling, or else the while thing blows up.

What I mean is toxic attitudes that harm people but that are not the fault of the one who has been forced, directly or otherwise, to take and then pass on that attitude.  

The attitude includes the idea that it is either all your fault or all mine. The "I hate you, I deserved worlds better" and then the "how dare you hate me for hating you, don't you love me?" and then the "I hate myself and am going to kill myself as recompense to prove my love and devotion to you and to punish and torture myself for torturing or harming or hurting you. Including by spilling the milk at dinner, because after how I treated you you deserve for me to never make any little mistake ever again."

The direct bias toward negativity that is also PTSD.

Also CPTSD.

Bipolar mania is often or maybe always indirect bias toward negative too, by forcing positive by and in the process of trying to induce it. (But this includes more positivity... celebrating your time feeling good after feeling terrible for so long... because quite frankly, you DESERVE to feel good after the nasty depression... and you deserve to feel just as good regardless.)

The negative bias of "someone needs to be blamed and punished for this in a way that involves some kind of torture, or else there will be no justice and no peace." The utter (and this is enforced on some level by someone somewhere, not their fault either) forgetting of the fact that there is another option... the perpetrator of a dehumanizing mistake or action or inaction simply acknowledging to you that you always deserved better, that you were always a sentient human being and that they were trying subconsciously to shoehorn you into a reductive role by treating you a certain way, and that from now on they will totally uphold the fact that you are infinitely more than that, as everyone is. That they will make mistakes forever, but that they will never the mistake of dehumanizing you ever again. Other mistakes don't matter and should be encouraged.

A further toxic idea that has to go is the idea that someone has to take all the blame for everything and for everyone. Or that everything and everyone is to blame other than some perfect person or other who might be the person blaming everyone else, or might be someone else whom the person has designated as their favorite person.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Roses Are Red, revised (had a lot of mistakes before)

Roberta's voicemail to Elton: Today's protest rally Roses are red, bear spray is for bears, the human you sprayed suffered retinal tears. If you need to defend yourself order some mace. If I see more bear spray I will cut up your face. Elton to Roberta: Moron. Roses are red, You're not as smart as you think. If you don't watch your mouth, you'll end up in the clink. I happen to know several cops and a judge. If you don't show respect I will beat you to sludge. Roberta to Elton: Hypocrite. Roses are red, You threatened me too. If today I'm arrested, tomorrow it's you. I have talked to your friends and I know you are bluffing. Leave me alone or I'll rip out your stuffing. Elton to Roberta: Cease and desist. Roses are red, Jail is boring. There isn't good food or even adequate flooring. If you don't stop now I will call the police. I will get your ass charged with disturbing my peace. Roberta to Elton: Protect yourself. Roses are red and I happe...

I'm back with a brand new rant about an old AND new issue.

The issue is this:  Don't ever call me passive and then expect to remain on good terms with me. "Passive" is not a neutral statement. "Passive" means stupid. "Passive" means incapable. "Passive" means lazy. "Passive" means confused, which basically in this case also means stupid. "Passive" means cowardly. "Passive" means not all there or vegetative. "Passive" can also mean boring, but that's the least of our worries given the other things it means. It is not a neutral term. Use it if you want; I'm not the speech or thought police. But using it on me will cost our friendship. Because just like I can't and would never force you to speak a certain way, you can't ad shouldn't want to force me to take demeaning, degrading treatment. "Passive" is the assumption that I don't have good reasons for being quiet or civil, or that I shouldn't be allowed to choose for myself whe...

You might need a new one. We all do sometimes.

To everyone in the world, myself included sometimes: If dehumanizing anyone is part of your religion, you need a new religion. If dehumanizing others is part of your job, then you need a new job. If dehumanizing people was part of your education, then you need a new education. If dehumanizing you is how your family bonds, then you need a new family. If dehumanizing you brings your friends closer together, then you need new friends. If dehumanizing someone is a release for you, then you need a new release. If dehumanizing anyone is a pastime for you, then you need a new pastime. If dehumanizing anyone at all, any sentient being, or everyone, or a few, or certain types, even sometimes, is your lifestyle, then you need a new lifestyle. I would never tell you WHAT lifestyle to have, just pick any one that doesn't involve or include or encourage dehumanization of anyone!